A Novel Perspective

When we hear annoyances of murder, rape or abduction of women, we usu anyy judge the case relying on the credibleness of those involved. In concord to severalise law, we try to establish credibility of the personalities involved such as the offender, the victim, and the witnesses to trance who is coition the truth. However, as trial prevails, relying on credibility several(prenominal)magazines acquits the offender, after presenting enough evidence to destroy the credibility of the victim. In Oates unequal story, Where Are You Going and Where Have You Been? the pen presents an example of a crime where the criminal could be easily acquitted based on evidence of the victims willful submission to the desires of the offender. However, revealing the hypnotism under(a)side the crime, the write implies a way to judge crimes using a figment perspective. Similar to the process of providing evidence in a trial, the author builds seat of the case through picture show. She establ ishes the personality of the main character named Connie. In the introduction, Connie is strongly contrasted with her stereotypical sister, June.She is described as far more independent than the latter, making her a strong and willful character. Based on this, it is easy to speak out that Connie is office staffly responsible for whatever she experiences from her abductor, Arnold Friend. In loanition, her strolling activities with her friends, not to mention her acquaintances with men, add to the denigration of her character. Her choice to be on her own while her friends go polar ship canal suggests her adventurous nature. Also, her beauty makes it easy for her to attract wariness especially from boys.Furthermore, occasions where she displays split personality, Everything about her had twain sides to it (408), could emphasize Connies inclination to hang out with guys alike(p) Arnold Friend. While most aspects of the characterization could lead one to believe that Connie is to be diabolic for her fate, the plot of the story, support by the dialogues, reveals the truth about the crime. The development of the action shows Connies confrontation to the will of the criminal. During the time Arnold tries to exchange Connie to get out of the house, Connie repeatedly dismisses him, telling him that she does not recognize him at all.She even tries to use the phone to consume for help. As employed, the dialogues support the fact that Connie is taken against her will, and that she should not be blamed for the events that follow. Some points leading to the abduction can be established against Arnold Friend. Specifically, Arnold Friends age, which is twice that of Connie, shows the mans sole accountability for the crime. Moreover, considering the fact that they atomic number 18 not of the same age maintains Connies dissociation from the man. Other evidences confirm that the crime was perfectly planned by a hard criminal.Specifically, the car, which bears Arnold s name, is used to show outward identification, indeed convincing Connie of his honest intention. Conversely, this could be used by Arnold as evidence of his innocence. It is easy to believe that if he really plans to abduct Connie, Arnold will not put his identification on his car. However, the judge should see the real motives behind the eager display of identity, which argon to convince the victim of the abductors honest intention, and even to sweep later allegations of abduction.Considering the car as evidence, it can be considered that the crime is conservatively planned, thus adding degree to the sentence if Arnold gets convicted. Further to the evidences provided, analyzing the crime in have of hypnosis could provide a different angle to the story. The way Connie behaves at the end, as she deliberately follows orders from Arnold, illustrates the latters use of hypnosis. Just before her recognise submission, Connie attempts to call the police, shut the door, scream out l oud, but feels besides wonky to do so. This weakness can be attributed to the hypnosis that Arnold uses upon her.Particularly, Connies cold feeling, and her explosive weakness to even touch the phones dial are signs of being under hypnosis. The narrator of the story recounts instances when Connie feels a wave of giddiness rise in her when she realizes how old Arnold and Ellie are, when she stares at the x sign that Arnold makes, and when she insures at Arnolds face as Ellie mumbles words from the vertebral columnground music in the car. The final part, where Connie submits to Arnolds embrace and closes the door of their house shows her fully hypnotise condition.Under hypnosis, Arnold easily convinces her to head into the car and elope with him, as if they two have a special relationship. Thus, to a bystander, this scene would make it look as if Connie really knows the guy, and that she intends to come with him in his car. This evidence, when presented later in court, could c onvince anyone of Connies willful consent, and could thus free the criminal. Revealing the element of hypnosis, the author suggests a novel perspective in judging crimes especially those cerebrate to Connies case, where the abductor is much older, and is a complete stranger.Showing symptoms of hypnotism, the author provides some insights one may use seeing a homogeneous scenario in real life. There are times when one sees some couples who look strange, for instance, the woman is too young for the man, or the girl looks too submissive or too innocent. Although this thought does not apply to all appearing in this guise, it may be wise to observe if hypnotism is present in such cases. This way, one may help crystalize the problem of heinous crimes committed against women and children.Further to the symptoms of hypnosis that the author presents, tracing the ways by which hypnosis is employed provides readers some ideas on how one can be placed under hypnosis, and consequently, how on e can rid of it. In the story, Arnold employs different means to put Connie under hypnosis. One is through the music he and Ellie play in the car. Notably, the mention of music in the scenes where Arnold sees Connie for the first time and when he is in front of Connies house suggests the offenders use of music to induce hypnosis.As Connie listens to the music, it makes her feel so good, like music at a church service (408) which she could depend upon. Tapping to the melodic line of music from Ellies radio Arnold makes Connie feel disoriented to the things around her. She on the spur of the moment diverts attention to different things, like asking Arnolds age, and becomes more assured of space than before. These behaviors show a significant change in her, thus implying abnormality of her state. In addition to the music, the x sign which Arnold makes in the give vent is likewise used to hypnotize her. After his hand fell back to his side the X was still in the air, almost visible ( 415).This illustrates Arnolds use of hand sign similar to a pendulum during process of hypnosis to combine Connies submission. Afterwards, all things did not come together (415) for Connie, and she finds it difficut to make whiz of things, including the way Arnold talks and taps his finger to the beat of the music. The final part which implies Connies hypnotism implies the use of a novel perspective in dealing with crimes in the modern society. As the story shows, putting subjects under hypnosis allows the offender to conduct the crime without force, thus avoiding accountability for it later on.Applying this to reality, the great unwashed who serve as witnesses to the closeness between the offender and the victim at the time of hypnosis will not shed light to the case because what they see is a mere facade, which happens under the control of the offender. Therefore, only the victims recall of what actually happened can help to convict a criminal. Until then, statutory evidence e stablishing credibility of the accused and the victims will not serve to bring justice. Instead, the use of a novel perspective such as uncovering occurrence of hypnotism proves to be the best way in dealing with crimes.