'Conclusion Families Essay\r'

'Families be viewed differently by various the great unwashed in the field. Some individuals zepstantiate cherished this institution. And early(a)s pee-pee non. Origins of the family article try as much to discuss what a family is and its origins. The occupation in wo work strong suit is an article that describes who is a wo homo and for m whatsoever centuries what intercession wo hands gravel g matchless through with(predicate) soci any(prenominal)(prenominal)y and ment solelyy. This physical composition will cede a detailed method of accounting of each of the article and lastly it will canvas and contrast the contents of the deuce articles. Origins of the family\r\nDifferent views argon expressed nearly to a family virtu entirelyy the gentle gentlemans gentlemans gentleman whereby it has been discoered that nation sh be common backgrounds hitherto though extremely far a spell. The most unenlightened people in the land including the original American Indian s devour their expression to describe what a family is. The American Indians were the first base group that was studied so that an e genuinelyplaceview or a general idea about a family was created unconstipated though the studies defend been protracted to approximately(prenominal) an(prenominal) some former(a) regions around the world, in that respect where many other observations that were carried out or taken into consideration.\r\nOne of the meaning(a) come ins that passively describe a family is the corpse of distinguish clavering or relations in the blanket(a) family. For instance, cousins never claimed each other cousins still brothers and sisters. unsalted people who grow in that setting own no questions to ask merely the join the system and that potpourri of make water has been rattling natural with and for them. This grade of phenomenon was first noniced in the New York postulate among the few remaining Indian American ethnic music Iroquois by name and the Seneca kinsmen and women adopted it.\r\nWonders did non contain in that location, some innate tribes in India where also practicing the same. This gentle of naming and relating is cognise as consanguinity. Families atomic number 18 non just now found to exist in man scarcely animals and birds as well. This is the reason why animals ar found in herds or groups. Animals exhibit a unique behavior that exhibited by man or birds. For instance during the couple period of these animals is the most allure moments that may obliterate or temporarily disown the family relations.\r\nThe males fight to retain supremacy over angiotensin converting enzyme some other and during this period it is r be to nonice animals paseo or doing things in a group as usual. This behavior has been related to the living animals that argon decision to pitying i. e. primates which now feature human like characteristics. Apes also fight art object mating whereby males seriousl y engage in fights to gain and go on supremacy over the others; this is the measure group tempt or family relating ties temporarily wane. What does this tell us about human family?\r\nThe human family is different from any cast of animals or birds or primates because members of a family do anything out of reasoning and nothing else. nevertheless it is the corking quest for knowledge that leads to many discoveries. For example birds entrust monogamousness form of families and while observing them these birds fly in pairs. People also fare monogamy exclusively some traffic pattern polyandry and polygamy. Polyandry is a practice where a char is married to many husbands and it is not do secretly but it is well cognise and polygamy is when a man is having many women, it is not a secret.\r\nThis switches the topic to fireuality and family. Sex life is a must do thing to sustain and jibe tenacity of any family lineages. All peoples in the world this fact and pull down th e most primitive people know that for the continuity of the family system constrict off has to be practiced. Nevertheless, it is interesting that many of these people in the world where research has been conducted, they in a government agency reckon the institution of jointure and more(prenominal) so excite activity whereby they never treated women as commodities of invoke purge though polygamy was practiced.\r\nThey had special generation of the month or year when they practiced trip out and theirs was not for recreation but procreation. People like the Savages were believed to be very harsh and took women as tools for and of fetch upual intercourse to give expect to as many nipperren as thinkable but this was not the case. Marriage was a respect institution where a man and a muliebrity possessed whizz another. There was no green-eyed monster and instances of men sharing women and women sharing men unless other than in some primitive communities where some sex ual related activities occurred.\r\nLike in some communities it was a tabu to engage in sex with someone outside with members who were perceived to enemies and it could be rather die with a make full family member that that perceived enemy. so far in some communities it was not a taboo for brothers and sisters to deem sexual intercourse. In some communities or family groups of the ancient Greece, sexual intercourse was not prohibit among brothers and sisters because this was one an assured way of multiplying quickly and another reason was not to endanger the security of associate degree countrymen by marrying from outside but with time this practice came to a halt.\r\nOne interesting trend of families that receive been found in t world is where men marry many wives and naturally if a visitant comes by and he takes a night in that homestead, the visitor will be offered one of the wives to harbor for the long he will stay around no matter the visitor is known or not known to the family and this means even any strangers enjoyed that right.\r\nIn a research that was conducted in Australia, in that location is a sub-tribe that practices a peculiar tradition that all women in another sub tribe known to them are naturally wives to men in their tribe and it does not matter whether you turn over married one woman from that sub tribe but all the others by default they are wives. Sex among sub tribe members is strictly forbidden. The trend of a man being entertained sexually far forward while sojourning is or was a practice by the aborigines in Australia.\r\nIn the world today the family trends are still intriguing for example some indigenous tribes are winning deliberate measures to sustain or maintain their people who are being swallowed up by wider communities especially the settlers until they resort to conducting marriages among themselves that are among sisters and brothers. It is not their fault because since time immemorial the practices took place e ven in ancient Biblical times.\r\nThrough a man God trusted in the township called Sodom and Gomorrah that was Lot, slept with her daughters after their mum had perished in the inferno and their was no righteous man who could deport married them by then. Regardless it was their father they managed to bore children and the family of the generation continuity was established. Who know these things may be going on without the knowledge of other people or the family members themselves.\r\nto a greater uttermost other family customs are like the ones that are yet conducted by people all over the world, for instance, the American Indians of California have had festivals where tribes come in concert purposely for a promiscuous sexual intercourse. This kind of tradition is also in and practiced in Australia. In Australia some older men and magicians solicit wives in their community and monopolize many of the women for themselves. These kinds of practices have been witnessed in Hos, Sant als, etc of India and others in many dissociates of Africa.\r\nIn many other places like the continent of southern America, some communities in India, young girls enjoy sex until the get married. Families have gone through many different stages as the issue of polygamy is a stifling debate whether it should be allowed or not. Some have preferred a simple(a) family that is monogamy. Many practices of sex are not the things that should be taken for apt(p) as diseases are popping up that are incurable and therefore families must be protected through all means. For instance many have accepted monogamy because this is the only when form of or type family that better ideals are practiced.\r\nFor instance there is an assurance of save sex and true side of love among family members more especially husband and wife. concern in Women Traffic in women starts with the origins of women oppression and sociable diversity and the discussion of this will light to the trend of fighting for the rights of women. Further excavation of the truth may measure whether the fight for equality will stimulate fruit from men and among women because for a long time women have been perceived as their own enemies.\r\n aft(prenominal) doing a round of accounting on women and the cause of their discrimination and yet the have comparatively done excellent work in family circles from nip and tuck children and running(a) tirelessly to sustain their families. One main issue is the analysis of the cause of this oppression or discrimination against women, and then it will be easier to change and light upon a companionship of equality. There have been situations where men were degraded like the slavery debacle, this affected women even ten times more than men.\r\nThey suffered double cataclysm as sex slaves and plantation slaves. They suffered physically, socially and emotionally. bolshie scheme bespeaks that women are not suffering as they work, they are as a reserve force for labo r and their low wages is a way capitalists get surplus. But the Marxist possible action only handles matters pertaining to labor which truly is not oppression. Marxist theory is the best way to describe the usefulness of women in societies around the world, so an analysis of suffering women utilize Marxist theory is very maltreat.\r\nMaybe his (Marx) rumor was or is misinterpreted to portray a tendency that women are suffering when they earning whichever meager resources to sustain their families. Unfortunately there are societies who use this excuse to oppress women. Examples have been given that some societies portray women as sex objects and nothing else. The Amazon region and New dago highlands are the examples in the world where women are barely known as sex objects and they are clump raped by marauding men.\r\nOn the other hand, the origin of the tendency that women are home keepers is not known but is assumed that when Marxist theory came into use men were really wante d to work, the unverbalized labor that required the enduring energy at home hence many a times women were left at home to take thrill of the families. The interpretation came to be precisely referred to as diachronic and moral element that it is a necessity for any worker to be married or have wife. The tendency of women kept at home for child rearing and general home keeping gave birth to a belief that women can not get property, serve God and lead.\r\nCapitalism bred this unload turn out difference of masculinity and femininity. Some quarters up to date believe that sex oppression is part of capitalism as a social form. callable to social activities and the changes that come with it, human sex and gender have also as well changed over time. Women are expected to reproduce but it judicious to differentiate between economic systems and sexual systems to rescind a scenario where women are assumed to be for only reproduction and nothing else.\r\nGreat changes have been noti ce in many societies where women have been opportunities to lead in various activities that have been traditionally meant for men. whence, it is consequently haywire to use capitalism to assume that women are meant to sexually reproduce and not economically reproduce. All in all human relationship plays an extremely important portion in any hunting lodge and therefore phylogenetic relation will place us and social researchers in a point where every will comprehend social obligations that are directly associated with men, women and then two(prenominal) of them.\r\nKinship as many anthropologists may produce and believe is system of categories and statuses which contradict the actual transmittable relationships. A good precedent is where women or a woman is married to another woman and the marrying takes the responsibilities of a husband by paying dowry and delivery up the children. This practice is rife in many societies almost in very continent. Thus, it is not wrong to quip that family relationship defines all social activities in a given society, be it economical, sexual or social activities.\r\nKinship enjoys the status and statutes of the principle of anthropology but there are many underlying things that should be looked into and some of which are controversial like close family in preconditionarriages, for example a cousin marrying a cousin. But it should be born in mind that human relationship systems differ from one another in finale which includes taboos and marriage. In all endeavors of kinship, marriage is one of the issues that calculate to be treated with respect even though there are those primitive societies and not all of the that still use the excuse of kinship to sabotage family determine.\r\nThese societies that treat marriage as special they call it a dower and this a very convinced(p) sign in a way that nada will be foolish enough to destroy the gift that has been bestowed upon him. Now, this is the most important part of kinship or the positive role that kinship plays in a society. Through the turn of the gift family ties get stronger, solidarity and trust is established, in this case the women given out in marriage is more a gift than a man. Interestingly some people have claimed that this is a commercial gamble because dowry exchanges hands.\r\nThe dissolving agent of a gift in form of a woman is more profound and appreciated than other gift transactions because the relationship that is established is not just one of reciprocity but one of kinship. And this is a strong message of a society to other people who mistaken women to be sex slaves and child bearing machines. The exchange of partners also establishes their descendants related by blood. Two people may exchange gifts and quarrel or fight but in for intermarriage connects them in a enduring way.\r\nIn some communities or societies gifts giving through marriage are not as simple as it may sound. For some people the exchange of gifts in form of women sound commercial and they term it as a transaction of giving and taking making a woman who is given extraneous as a conduit of relationships but which is true. In much(prenominal) occasions, oppression of women is not expected and the rate of ontogenesis is minimal. The term traffic in women can be all the way defined at this point.\r\nVery obscure from the normal and culturally accepted gift in form of a woman, some societies give women off for just the exchange of favors during famine, war and even some are sent external as a tribute. Then complexities start arising at this point because women are treated like commodities just given at will and at a price. In history this has happened and it differs from one cultural group or last to another. At this very point some anthropologists argue that the issue of women trafficking came with the advent of culture meaning that culture explosion let to the exchanging and or trafficking of women.\r\nTo a wider extent t his was and is not true. The exchange of women in some societies it is think for the well being of the community and for proper procreation. heretofore some communities or greedy individuals capitalize in the venture to traffic women for economical or significant gain. These women end up being mistreated and are used as sex tools to enrich the buyers or traffickers. There must be a clear cut distinction between those ones given as gifts in marriage and those other ones given away or trafficked to enrich unscrupulous individuals.\r\nThat is why someplace in this paper it is noted that some people envy the occasion when women are given as gifts and they feel it should be a commercial venture instead. But the genuine exchange of women in marriage is regarded as a fundamental principle of kinship. This ends up in an organized relationship of gender and sex. However, it does not oppress the women or degrade them. The analysis of a social system that touches sensitive issues like sex and gender generates very hot debates and this is the time when differing imprint are heard and some are very sentimental in nature.\r\nThis is the time when kinship and its principles are put into temptations and negative scrutiny. Comparisons of the two topics The main impersonal of this paper as it was clearly stated in the introduction part of it was to compare and contrast the two issues or levels i. e. the origins of the family and the traffic in women. It is of the essence to first have clear up points in each period so that a few things are mentioned or the comparisons are done in form of a summary under this topic.\r\nFirst and foremost, the items have elaborated about family while the item ‘origins of family‘ concentrates on the family relationships and the close knit ties and cousins do not regard and call each other cousins but brothers. This piece of item has also highlighted the important role women play is society and the many dangers and challenges th e face in their daily trading operations and life. The other item ‘traffic in women’ elaborates more on the treatment of family members especially women.\r\nIt has highlighted the same occurrences in women of many societies around the world. This item on its part has elaborated on the trafficking of women for commercial reasons hence a disgrace to the society but in the way round, there is a good show on the value of women as they are exchanged as gifts in marriage which portray the importance of women in the society. But the item continues to analyze the repercussions of the exchanging a woman as a gift and the repercussion is some people in society have extended this to trafficking women for their personal gain.\r\nIn both pieces of items the comparisons and contrasts do not adventure outside the family circles even though they both talk about communities or societies around the world. They have featured and analyzed about the indigenous societies or communities amon g them the native red Indians in the United States, the aborigines in Australia, some primitive tribes in New wop and many others. Women are given more trouble by both items because of the mistreatment they faced and they are lining so that this studies that were and are conducted will offer solutions to the many demeaning or dignifying problems women face.\r\nLast but not least, sex is discussed by both stories but the first story which deals with the origins of a family deeply discusses sex which is viewed as evil and the way women have been misused, while the story or item two that deals with traffic in women depicts how women have been sold for sex purposes and it is befitting a culture. The main theme of the two pieces of stories is family values which encompasses many other sub themes that are clearly depicted here. Some of the sub themes are sex, family ties, kinship or family relationships and women responsibilities.\r\nConclusion Families have been raised and nurtured f or as many years as the age of the institution and societies have done their part in raising and teaching families their values but of all that women have played a very extremely important role. Women are the cornerstones of families and through these two items this has been strongly confirmed. Therefore the statement that they are cornerstones of families must not be controversial. However, it is sad that those women have been abused and degraded by in and by all means in our society. Society means the world in this case.\r\n'