This assignment is on the pros and cons of the majority rules system in Australia.

legal age Rules Verdict A. Outline the minds that start raceway to this law being changed. The bug out Rules Verdict is in forcefulness in a smattering of states in Australia. The main cases for changing the standard laws for jury Verdicts to Majority Rules, is that it is very expensive to grasp 12 jurors penned up in a hotel for a few age to even weeks, wholly because ace person refuses to score with the stick. Another important reason is that the Majority Rules Verdict is slight time consuming and result allow for more cases to be heard. Also it is important that the jurors contribute get back to their conventionalism lives, instead of days penned up in a hotel close to a case. B.Discuss the effects (both constructive and negative) this law change will have on the community POSITIVE - superstar reason is to minimise the number of juries that hang. If your jury hangs, you feel you have gaunt the courts time; penurious money and more signifi give noticetly wasted your own time. - Cases involving hung juries dont have to take many days to suffice the problems. Thus, cases can be heard and a finding of point can be a lot quicker if bulk rules verdict is used. - Majority rules verdict overcomes the problem of the rogue or perverse juror who refuses to listen to the other jurors or the evidence. ostracize -In idealistic circumstances, someone may be wrongly sentenced because of the bulk rules verdict. Where the one person against the jury could have actually convinced the rest of the jury. -It upholds the requirement of proof beyond clean doubt. Allowing a juror to dissent from a verdict of guilty essence that at least one juror had a reasonable doubt, which can create uncertainty in the conviction. C. Write a letter... If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full e ssay, visit our page: write my paper