Media, particularly newspapers, is considered to be one of the most effective ways of educating the general public on current events going on around them. However, when an incident happens that strikes the interest of the world as a whole, it is evident that the news articles produced in the distinguishable regions will differ. This is non to say that the diversity is found within the facts of the paper, as there isnt any question as to the specifics of the affair. Instead, the discrepancies are found in how the incident is presented. On June 13, 2003, radioactive material was found in a taxi in central Tbilisi, Georgia. This caused much guesswork around the world with concerns arising regarding who it belonged to, and what it was to be used for. Three newspapers, The capital of Thailand Post, The San Francisco Chronicle, and the Agence France Presse, were a few who chose to report on this business relationship, all through an arms-length perspective. Each outlined the event in a different way, with some putting much emphasis on the facts alone, and others relating it to the greater, and more alarming issue of terrorism. The impact these biases have on the story are evident in all 3 newspapers, change the final thought of the reader towards the occurrence.
The first article presented, Agence France Presse curtly states the progression of the event, not focusing on the danger of the distasteful bomb or the need for concern towards it. This article did not go into depth, only mentioning the materials found in the taxi and the assertable relation to terrorist activity. Whats unique to this piece is the short description of what the bomb could lead to: a low intensity blast commensurate of spreading toxic nuclear waste (Agence France Presse). This short bill furthers the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper